首页> 外文OA文献 >Coverage and Capacity Analysis of Sigfox, LoRa, GPRS, and NB-IoT
【2h】

Coverage and Capacity Analysis of Sigfox, LoRa, GPRS, and NB-IoT

机译:sigfox,LoRa,GpRs和NB-IoT的覆盖范围和容量分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper the coverage and capacity of SigFox, LoRa, GPRS, and NB-IoT is compared using a real site deployment covering 8000 km2 in Northern Denmark. Using the existing Telenor cellular site grid it is shown that the four technologies have more than 99 % outdoor coverage, while GPRS is challenged for indoor coverage. Furthermore, the study analyzes the capacity of the four technologies assuming a traffic growth from 1 to 10 IoT device per user. The conclusion is that the 95 %-tile uplink failure rate for outdoor users is below 5 % for all technologies. For indoor users only NB-IoT provides uplink and downlink connectivity with less than 5 % failure rate, while SigFox is able to provide an unacknowledged uplink data service with about 12 % failure rate. Both GPRS and LoRa struggle to provide sufficient indoor coverage and capacity.
机译:本文使用丹麦北部8000 km2的实际站点部署比较了SigFox,LoRa,GPRS和NB-IoT的覆盖范围和容量。使用现有的Telenor蜂窝站点网格显示,这四种技术的室外覆盖率均超过99%,而GPRS面临室内覆盖率的挑战。此外,研究假设每位用户的物联网设备流量从1增加到10,分析了这四种技术的容量。结论是,对于所有技术,室外用户的95%瓦片上行链路故障率均低于5%。对于室内用户,仅NB-IoT提供的上行链路和下行链路连接故障率不到5%,而SigFox能够提供未经确认的上行链路数据服务,故障率约为12%。 GPRS和LoRa都难以提供足够的室内覆盖范围和容量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号